Legal Opinion

Browne v. Blood

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1964No. 30,182Published

1Opinion

On Petition For Rehearing.

Achor, C. J.

— Appellants, in support of their petition for rehearing, assert that the opinion as heretofore written is in error in two particulars.

First, although it appears from the record that there was a defect of parties in this appeal, in that, as stated in the opinion, “appellants failed to name two of the petitioners in the original proceedings or to substitute any parties in their stead,” appellants seek to explain away this fact by now filing a supplemental “affidavit of the parties.”

As noted in the opinion, there were other defects of parties, as a result…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hancock v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Whisler v. WhislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hutchinson's Estate v. Arnt, Admx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Kain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Browne v. BloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API