In re the Guardianship of Durnell

(concurring specially on rehearing) :

As correctly noted in the majority opinion, the contentions of error relied on for reversal of the judgment of the trial court ■“are premised on the general proposition that Guardian had the necessary vouchers and receipts and would have produced the same if the court had granted her the necessary time.” This premise is not legally sound based on the record presented herein.

The record reflects that the clear, mandatory provisions of 58 O.S. 1961, § 550 were originally brought to the attention of Guardian by supplemental objections, and requests filed April…