Legal Opinion

Turner v. Strenzel

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1886No. 9444PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Action by the assignee of material-men to foreclose what is alleged to be a mechanic’s lien.

There was a demurrer by defendant Strenzel to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which was sustained. The plaintiff declined to amend, and judgment was entered against him, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The complaint states that the defendant Strenzel was the owner of the premises on which he contracted with Sylvester and Langabee to erect a building for the sum of eight thousand two hundred dollars; that the contractors,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walsh v. McMenomyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Stimson v. Dunham, Carrigan, Hayden Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Nason v. JohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. McCue v. JackmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Buchanan v. CritesUtah Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API