Legal Opinion
In Re Miller
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided July 9, 2010No. 19-00121PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING VENUE OF CHAPTER 13 CASE
JAMES D. GREGG, Chief Judge.
I.ISSUE.
Richard K. Miller (“Debtor”) filed his chapter 13 bankruptcy ease on August 3, 2009. The State Bank of Florence (“Bank”) timely filed its Motion for Dismissal (“Motion”) asserting that the Debt- or’s case is improperly venued. The only issue is whether this bankruptcy case was filed in the proper district or not.
II.PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.
The court held an evidentiary hearing on February 10, 2010 at which twenty-nine (29) exhibits were admitted into evidence (Exh. 1-16 for the Bank; Exh. A-M for the Debtor). The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coury v. ProtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Williamson v. OsentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Ellen Hawes, for Herself and in Representation of the Minors Ana Francisca Hawes and Maria Cristina Hawes v. Club Ecuestre El ComandanteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bavelis v. Doukas (In Re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- State Bank v. Miller (In Re Miller)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011
- In Re: Richard Miller V.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- In re: Richard K. MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011