Albert v. Boston Mortgage Bond Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract, by the assignee of the person to whom payments were to be made by the mortgagee under the provisions of a construction loan mortgage against the mortgagee, the declaration as .amended containing three counts, which are described in the opinion. Writ in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston dated May 20, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
It appears from the report of the trial judge that one Bessie Hurvich was the owner of a certain parcel of land and that the defendant made a construction loan thereon to her under a written agreement and a supplemental agreement, the loan being secured by a mortgage on the premises. The owner, by her attorney, in writing, on September 28, 1917, assigned to the plaintiff the balance of the payments provided for in the agreement. The building being in an unfinished state, the plaintiff and the defendant’s treasurer had a conversation with reference to completing it, and thereafter the latter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Day v. CatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Homer v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- F. W. Zemier & Co. v. Beacon Investment Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- Finard & Co. v. Sitt Asset ManagementMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Nassr v. COMMONWEALTH NASSRMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Bolen v. Paragon Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- Home Carpet Cleaning Co. v. BakerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Katz v. SilinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.