Legal Opinion

FRNDAK v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2025No. 2:20-cv-01411Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEITH FRNDAK and DIANE FRNDAK, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 2:20-1411 ) v. ) Judge Cathy Bissoon ) CORPORAL GREGORY BOGAN, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER I. MEMORANDUM For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 111) will be granted in part and denied in part. The lengthy factual and procedural history of this case is well-known to the parties, and the Court will not repeat it in detail here. Generally, Plaintiff brought this matter against Defendant Bogan and others no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mci Telecommunication Corporation v. Bell Atlantic-PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Zion v. NassanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Williams ex rel. Williams v. PapiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API