Robison v. State

PARKS, Judge,

specially concurring:

In disposing of the first portion of appellant’s third assignment of error, the majority holds that the issue is barred by res judicata. I agree with this conclusion. However, for the reasons stated below, I would also note that there appears to have been no conflict of interest regarding appellate counsel’s representation of appellant.

The record reveals that in 1977 appellant entered pleas of guilty, pursuant to a plea *1253agreement, to two (2) felony charges m Stephens County District Court before then District Judge Hegel Branch, Jr. Following appellant’s…