Ford v. Taylor
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada
In Equity. On motion to vacate order appointing a receiver.
1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge
(orally). This suit was brought in the state court upon what may be designated a grubstake contract, which it is claimed in the bill of complaint constituted a copartnership between plaintiff and defendants in the location of certain designated mining claims in Goldfield Mining District, Nev. An injunction was issued and a receiver appointed. Subsequently the cause was removed to this court, and motions made to vacate said orders, especially the order appointing a receiver, upon several grounds: (1) Because the said receiver was improperly appointed; (2) that said receiver was appointed ex…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Latta v. KilbournSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Monroe Cattle Co. v. BeckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Dravo v. FabelSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. Workingmen's Amalgamated Council of New OrleansU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1893
- Vigel v. HoppSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Ready Auto Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
- Marion Mortgage Co. v. EdmundsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- Miller v. Fisco, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Zinke-Smith, Inc. v. MarloweDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.