Wilcox v. Luco
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of tbe Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco vacating a judgment. J. M. Sea-well, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1DissentMeFABLAND, J.
I dissent. My views of the ease were expressed in my opinion delivered when the case was in Department.
The following is the opinion of Department Two, rendered on July 16, 1896, referred to and adopted by Mr. Justice McFarland:
McFARLAND, J. — The only question presented in this case is, whether the superior court had jurisdiction in a civil ease over the person of the defendant, who is the consul general of Chili for the United States, resident at San Francisco, California. The court below held that it had no jurisdiction, and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The question was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. PackardSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Miller v. Van Loben SelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885