Legal Opinion

Richard A. Denholm v. Houghton Mifflin Company and the Riverside Publishing Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1990No. 87-5987Published

1Opinion of the Court

912 F.2d 357

Richard A. DENHOLM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY and the Riverside Publishing

Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-5987.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1989.

Decided Aug. 27, 1990.

Stanley Sklute, Gerald Goldfarb, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Michael H. Diamond, Harriet S. Posner, Laura R. Medinnus, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before TANG, HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

BRU…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API