Legal Opinion
Rieder v. Apfel
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 2000No. 1:98-cv-00608PublishedCited by 231 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MUNLEY, District Judge.
Before the court is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (hereinafter “Commissioner”). The Commissioner denied plaintiffs claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (hereinafter “DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (hereinafter “SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (hereinafter “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433,1381-1383.
Before the court for disposition are plaintiffs objections to the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas M.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Harold MASON, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by231 opinions
- Weidman v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Taylor v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Schoengarth v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006
- Mawson v. Pittston Police DepartmentDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Witkowski v. ColvinDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.