Legal Opinion

Barrick Goldstrike Mine v. Peterson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2000No. 33460PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Respondent Todd Peterson (“Peterson”) failed to comply with NRS 616C.020(1) by not filing his workers’ compensation claim within ninety days of suffering a work-related injury. Appellant Barrick Goldstrike Mine (“Barrick”) denied Peterson’s claim due, in part, to his failure to file a timely claim, and Peterson appealed this decision. A hearing officer and an appeals officer from the Nevada Department of Administration both reversed Barrick’s decision and granted Peterson benefits. The district court affirmed the appeals officer’s decision and denied judicial review. For the reasons…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State Employment Security Department v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Robertson Transportation Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Charlie Brown Construction Co. v. City of Boulder CityNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Maxwell v. State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kay v. NunezNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Banks Ex Rel. Banks v. Sunrise Hosp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Construction Industry Workers' Compensation Group Ex Rel. Mojave Electric v. ChalueNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Johnson v. HinkelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Day v. Washoe County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API