Legal Opinion

Ward v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1982No. SC 28228PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Plaintiffs-taxpayers challenge a county assessor’s valuation of their real property for ad valorem tax purposes. The subject property is a 26-acre parcel of real property which includes 20 condominium units and a number of undeveloped tax lots. This appeal concerns only the assessor’s valuation of a 14-acre (10 tax lots) undeveloped portion of the parcel. The Tax Court found that plaintiffs had not established that the fair market value of the tract in question was different than the assessed value and upheld the valuation by the Department of Revenue. Plaintiffs appeal contending that on de…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kem v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Portland Canning Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bend Millwork Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sabin v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Medical Building Land Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. El Paso County Board of Equalization v. CraddockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Ernst Brothers Corp. v. Department.of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Barbur Plaza v. Multnomah Cty. Assessor, Tc-Md 090681b (or.tax 9-30-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
  4. Brashnyk v. Lane County Assessor, Tc-Md 110308 (or.tax 12-12-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
  5. Buck v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 090876c (or.tax 6-30-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API