Kash v. State

Martin Kash was convicted of theft.1 He was fined $5,000.00 and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of not less than one (1) year nor more than ten (10) years.2 His appeal raises these issues:

ISSUE ONE: Was the evidence sufficient to support his conviction?

ISSUE TWO: Did the trial court err by denying his motion for directed verdict?

*668ISSUE THREE: Did the trial court err by allowing the State to pass an exhibit to the jury alter the State had rested?

We affirm.

I

Sufficiency and Directed Verdict

When the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence is questioned, this Court must carefully examine the…