Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Alpena Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Alpena. Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

The Alpena Lumber Company brought an action of trover to recover the value of certain logs purchased by defendants below at a mortgage sale.

Both parties claim title through the firm of B. Cushman & Co., the defendants, under two chattel mortgages •given January 20th and June 12th, 1874, and a sale thereunder; the plaintiff, under a chattel mortgage given August 14th, 1874, with authority to sell thereunder, given afterwards, and other instruments not necessary to refer to.. The plaintiff below, defendant in error, was under the undisputed facts clearly entitled to recover, if the two…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stonebraker v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Horn v. ReitlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. Souders v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Dodds v. NeelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
  5. Wattles v. CobbNebraska Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API