Legal Opinion · Dissent

Durham v. Scrivener

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 1, 1920No. 6343Published

1Dissent

I dissent from the judgment of this court overruling the motion for a rehearing, for the following reasons:(1) The right to have a writ of garnishment, upon the ground that the plaintiff has obtained a judgment against the defendant in the main suit, means that he has obtained a final judgment in such cause.(2) A judgment is not final until the time for perfecting an appeal therefrom has expired. The time for such appeal had not expired when the garnishment was sued out herein.(3) No judgment, except by default, can properly be rendered without some evidence to support it. The evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas Trunk Railway Co. v. Jackson Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Van Natta v. Van NattaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Levy v. Engle Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Bergman Produce Co. v. First State Bank of PaducahCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API