Legal Opinion

Hall, Roderick

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2015No. WR-81,914-03Published

1Opinion of the Court

CASE NO. RODERICK ANDRE HALL, Defehdant V. THE sTATE oF TEXAS COUNTY OF LUBBOCK, Respondent 2012-436,716-€ § § § 31 ,M/~oz RECE\VED \N couRT oF cR\M\NAL APPEALS \'-"EB 052015 Abe\ Acosia. C§\e\'k DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S RESPONSE TO HIS HABEAS CORPUS AND TO DEFENSE COUNSEL'S AFFIDAVIT COMES NOW the defendant, Roderick Andre Hall (hereafter referred to as defendant), respectfully moves this Honorable court in Pro Se, in response to District Attorney Matthew D. Powell response to defendant's Writ of Habeas Corpus Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and in response…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API