Legal Opinion

City and County of San Francisco v. Coyne

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 2008No. A118222PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMONS, J.

Appellants Martin J. Coyne (Coyne) and Brian Murphy O’Flynn (O’Flynn) are former owners of a parcel of undeveloped property located on Lombard Street in San Francisco that was acquired by respondent City and County of San Francisco (CCSF) in an eminent domain proceeding. The taking frustrated appellants’ plan to develop a multiunit residential and commercial complex on that site, and in the eminent domain proceeding they sought damages for lost business goodwill. The trial court, however, barred that claim. A jury ultimately rendered a judgment awarding appellants just…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Contra Costa Water District v. Bar-C PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Inglewood Redevelopment Agency v. AkliluCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Dry Canyon Enterprises, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Presidio Performing Arts FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Rockey v. Capabianca CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API