Legal Opinion

Nappi v. Holub

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 2010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages resulting from the discharge of petroleum pursuant to Navigation Law § 181 and for declaratory relief, the defendants Richard Holub and Holub Enterprises, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), entered June 12, 2009, as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the fifth cause of *1111action insofar as asserted against them, and dismissing the sixth through eighth causes of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Holub…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. White v. LongNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Hjerpe v. GlobermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Fuchs & Bergh, Inc. v. Lance Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Route 104 & Route 21 Development, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Bennett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Kolbert v. Morania OilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Marist College v. Chazen Environmental Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Scott v. Triborough Energy Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API