Legal Opinion

Pickett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1995No. CR 95-145PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant, a habitual offender, was arrested for selling cocaine. He was charged and, as he was preparing for trial, interpreted the new presumptive sentencing guidelines, Ark. Code Ann. § 16-90-803 and -804 (Supp. 1993), to make him eligible for a sentence of only fifty-four months, although the statutory range for sale of cocaine is from ten to sixty years. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401 (a)(l)(i) (Repl. 1993). However, he observed that the presumptive sentencing guidelines do not apply to jury trials. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-90-803 (a)(1) and (b)(4). He did not want to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. McCambridge v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Cellars v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Hutcherson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API