Pickett v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellant, a habitual offender, was arrested for selling cocaine. He was charged and, as he was preparing for trial, interpreted the new presumptive sentencing guidelines, Ark. Code Ann. § 16-90-803 and -804 (Supp. 1993), to make him eligible for a sentence of only fifty-four months, although the statutory range for sale of cocaine is from ten to sixty years. Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401 (a)(l)(i) (Repl. 1993). However, he observed that the presumptive sentencing guidelines do not apply to jury trials. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-90-803 (a)(1) and (b)(4). He did not want to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCambridge v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Cellars v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Hutcherson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.