Seeman v. . Levine
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 21, 1910, which reversed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiffs and directed judgment for defendants. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCollin, J.
The action is upon an undertaking executed by the defendants to the pi aintiffs under section 85 of the Municipal Court Act of New York city (Laws of 1902, chap. 580). The plaintiffs, creditors of one Chill, had attached, as the property of Chill, a stock of goods and merchandise, which was claimed by the defendant Levine. The defendants, in order that Levine might receive the property from the marshal, gave the undertaking, which was conditioned, in conformity to said section 85, that, in an action thereon to be commenced within three months thereafter, Levine would establish that he was the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKinley v. . HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Hopkins v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- City of Buffalo v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Fritz v. . TompkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Kafka v. LevensohnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- In Re the Probate of the Will of BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- McAleenan v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- People v. . BreslerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.