Legal Opinion

Roth v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2007No. 20060241Published

1Opinion of the Court

735 N.W.2d 882 (2007)

2007 ND 112

Todd ROTH, Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee.

No. 20060241.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

July 25, 2007.

Joe A. Johnson, Nelson, Blumer & Johnson, P.L.L.P., Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Cynthia M. Feland, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee.

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Todd A. Roth appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Roth argues his trial and appellate counsel was plainly ineffective for failing to challenge the nighttime…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API