Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Persky

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1920Published

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMullan, J.

The plaintiff vendees sued the defend-

ant vendor for breach of contract, claiming in their complaint a damage of $951. Immediately after the jury was impaneled and sworn, plaintiffs’ counsel moved for the allowance of an amendment increasing the demand to $1,950, whereupon the learned trial justice said he would take the proofs, and that the motion might be thereafter renewed. Evidence sufficient to show a considerably greater damage than $951 was adduced, and when both sides had rested plaintiffs’ counsel said: “I move to increase the amount,” to which the court replied: “ I will leave it to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fish v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Corning v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  3. Dox v. DeyNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  4. Curtiss v. LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  5. Knapp v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API