Legal Opinion

Friends of Animals v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2018No. 15-35639PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the Migratory Bird Treaty Act allows the United States government to issue a permit to remove birds of one species for scientific purposes if its intent is principally to benefit another species.

I

A

This case arises from efforts by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”) to balance the interests of two types of owls who compete for the same territory. The first is the northern spotted owl, whose range is from British Columbia to California but the majority of which are “found in the Cascades of Oregon and the Klamath…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. James HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Pacific Choice Seafood Company v. Wilbur RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Idaho Conservation League v. BpaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  4. Stand Up for Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  5. Friends of Animals v. Deb HaalandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API