Legal Opinion

Paepcke v. Kirkman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1932No. 6303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from decrees canceling the claims of appellants to a tract of land formed by accretion, lying between the Mississippi shore line and the Mississippi river, as clouds Upon the titles of appellants. Separate suits were brought, but they were consolidated for trial. Appellees are the undisputed owners of adjoining plantations up to the shore line, and as such also own the accretion land between the shore line and the river unless they have lost title by adverse possession. By consent of the parties, the cases were referred to a master to hear and determine…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Davis v. SchwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Hunnicutt v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Archer v. Southern Ry. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co. v. BufordMississippi Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cinque Bambini Partnership v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. John F. Iselin and Joan B. Iselin v. Lester J. Meng, Lester J. Meng, Jr., James C. Meng, the General Box Company, Inc., and C. W. Hunter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Parker v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  4. Mississippi Valley Timber Co. v. Mengel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API