Legal Opinion

Bundles v. Idaho-Oregon Light & Power Co.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided August 28, 1914Published

At Law. Action by A. H. Sundles against the Idaho-Oregon Light & Power Company, continued in the name of W. J. Ferris, appointed receiver of the defendant’s property pendente lite. On motion for judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

DIETRICH, District Judge.

The defendant corporation is engaged in furnishing to private consumers electric light and power, and on or about June 5, 1913, in the course of the construction of one of its transmission lines, its employés carelessly left a wire suspended in such a way that the plaintiff, while mowing weeds in the public highway, came into contact therewith and was very seriously injured. He commenced this action in the state district court to recover damages, and upon the petition of defendant the same was removed to this court. In the meantime, in a suit originally brought…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gregg v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Kansas City, W. & N. W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1892
  5. St. Louis Trust Co. v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API