Legal Opinion

Vallies v. Sky Bank

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 2008No. 2:01cv1438PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2008, upon due consideration of defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 108) and the parties’ submissions in conjunction therewith, IT IS ORDERED that the motion be, and the same hereby is, granted.

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment squarely raises the issue of whether a showing of detrimental reliance is a prerequisite to recovering actual damages under section 1640(a) of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) when the defendant has committed a disclosure violation. Specifically, in making…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. William T. Lyons Jr. v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API