Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sherry Allen and Wayne Allen v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2014No. 10-CV-1425Published

1DissentEasterly, Associate Judge

This is not a public duty doctrine case— at least not as the public duty doctrine has ever been conceived by this court. As its name suggests, the ostensible goal in applying this doctrine, at least at first, was to discern whether the District had an actionable duty of care when its agents were alleged to have acted negligently. But there should be no question that the District owed a duty of care to Eric Allen. The District, through its FEMS agents, screened Mr. Allen and invited him to the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Services (FEMS) Training Academy to take FEMS’s…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. United States v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Wood v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API