Legal Opinion

C. A. King & Co. v. Horton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1927No. 20078PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

In disposing of this case we disclaim any purpose to overturn the general doctrine non allegata non probata, but, on the contrary, the conclusions we have reached are upon the theory that that doctrine has no application to the instant case for two reasons:

First. Enough appears in the pleadings to show that the contract was not one where grain was actually sold or expected to be delivered, but, on the contrary, was an “executory contract which the party paying or to pay does not intend to complete by receiving or delivering the whole of that which is so contracted for, but to resell before…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Hill v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. Williams v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Black v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Thermice Corp. v. Vistron Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Am. Family Ins. Co. v. HoopOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API