Legal Opinion

Ferris v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Tbe acknowledged rale in tbis jurisdiction in regard to removal upon tbe ground of fraudulent joinder is tbus declared by Stacy, G. J., in Crisp v. Fibre Co., 193 N. C., 77: “TJpon tbe filing of sucb petition, in apt time, wben tbe fraudulent joinder is sufficiently alleged, tbe suit or action must be removed to tbe Federal Court, and if tbe plaintiff desires to traverse tbe jurisdictional facts, be must do so in tbat tribunal on motion to remand.” Smith v. Quarries Co., 164 N. C., 338.

It is further established law tbat: “If tbe facts alleged in tbe petition, taken to be true, show tbat tbe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Cox v. Whitmer-Parsons Pulp & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Killian v. . HannaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Armijo v. Ward Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Womack v. . ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API