Legal Opinion

People v. Cheatham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 26, 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), entered on or about May 5, 2006, which granted defendants’ motions to suppress physical evidence and defendant Cheatham’s motion to suppress statements and dismissed the indictment, unanimously reversed, on the law, defendant McDowell’s *298motion to suppress denied, defendant Cheatham’s motion to suppress denied except to the extent it seeks to suppress statements as involuntary, the indictment reinstated and defendant Cheatham’s motion to suppress remitted to Supreme Court for it to determine the voluntariness of his statements.

In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. ManiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. PonderNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. RasulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API