Legal Opinion

Quinn v. SEPTA

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 14, 1994No. 1903Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

AVELLINO, J.,

Joseph Quinn, a 25-year SEPTA employee, was summarily discharged, and, following an in-house “post-determination hearing,” appealed to common pleas citing the Local Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. §§551-55, 751-54. Assuming arguendo that Quinn is entitled to a statutory appeal,1 I think he has selected the wrong forum. Briefly, it is perfectly *518clear that SEPTA is a Commonwealth agency. See e.g., Feingold v. SEPTA, 512 Pa. 567, 577-78, 517 A.2d 1270, 1275-76 (1986). Consequently, the Commonwealth Court alone has jurisdiction of Quinn’s putative appeal. See 42 Pa.C.S.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Wortman v. Philadelphia Commission on Human RelationsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. East Stroudsburg University v. HubbardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Casselli v. COM., STATE POLICECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. FasyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API