Legal Opinion
Segall v. Heyer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 22, 1990PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about November 2, 1989, which granted plaintiffs motion for reargument/renewal and on reargument/renewal, denied defendant Albrecht Heyer’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
*472Plaintiff was referred by her doctor to defendant Albrecht Heyer, a nutritionist at defendant Humiston Health Center, to design a proper diet compatible with her allergic conditions. She initially met briefly with defendant Karl E. Humiston, M.D. The only other contact plaintiff had with Dr. Humiston on subsequent visits…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Rodney v. New York Pyrotechnic Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Pinto v. PintoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Weisse v. KamhiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wall Street Associates v. BrodskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ramos v. DekhtyarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Henry v. PegueroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Scannell v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- American Continental Properties, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.