Commonwealth v. Belani
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
SHOGAN, J.:
Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from the orders entered on March 1, 2013, precluding the admission of DNA evidence at the trials of Appellees, Jack Belani and Wenjue Liu. 1 We are constrained to reverse.
The Commonwealth assails the trial court’s orders excluding DNA evidence that would tie Appellees to a robbery during which Appellee Liu shot the victim in the leg. The trial court summarized the facts as follows:
[O]n July 24, 2008, [Appellees], along with another co-conspirator, went to the complainant’s apartment to commit an armed robbery. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. HugginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MatisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. MoserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. IvySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. RosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. RibotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. GillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. MonarchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.