Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Belani

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 2014No. 943 EDA 2013PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from the orders entered on March 1, 2013, precluding the admission of DNA evidence at the trials of Appellees, Jack Belani and Wenjue Liu. 1 We are constrained to reverse.

The Commonwealth assails the trial court’s orders excluding DNA evidence that would tie Appellees to a robbery during which Appellee Liu shot the victim in the leg. The trial court summarized the facts as follows:

[O]n July 24, 2008, [Appellees], along with another co-conspirator, went to the complainant’s apartment to commit an armed robbery. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. BurkeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. HugginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. MatisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. MoserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IvySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. RosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. RibotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. GillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. MonarchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API