Legal Opinion

Luo v. AIK Renovation Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 14, 2025No. 1:23-cv-05878Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: monn nrc nanan KK DATE FILED:_04/14/2025 SHIXUAN LUO, : Plaintiff, : : 23-cv-5878 (LJL) -v- : : MEMORANDUM AND AIK RENOVATION INC., STEVE NEJASMIC, and : ORDER MICHAEL RENOSIS, : Defendants. : LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Shixuan Luo (“Luo” or “Plaintiff’) moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a), for a new trial. Dkt. No. 72. For the following reasons, the motion for a new trial is denied. “A trial court should not grant a motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lore v. City of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Charles R. Carlton v. Mystic Transportation, Inc., Mystic Bulk Carriers, Inc., and Leonard BaldariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API