United States v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant Mulunas Nomost Jackson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues: (1) the district court erred in using parole documentation to determine the nature of a prior conviction; (2) the district court erred in finding that the prior conviction was a “controlled substance offense”; and (3) the government breached its plea agreement with him. Because the government failed to satisfy its obligation under the plea agreement, we VACATE the sentence and REMAND for re-sentencing before a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Ray Lawrence MondragonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Luis A. MontanezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Rhonda FitchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Sathon EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012