Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 10, 2008No. 07-3121UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant Mulunas Nomost Jackson appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues: (1) the district court erred in using parole documentation to determine the nature of a prior conviction; (2) the district court erred in finding that the prior conviction was a “controlled substance offense”; and (3) the government breached its plea agreement with him. Because the government failed to satisfy its obligation under the plea agreement, we VACATE the sentence and REMAND for re-sentencing before a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. Ray Lawrence MondragonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Luis A. MontanezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Rhonda FitchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Sathon EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API