Legal Opinion

Frair v. Caswell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1914No. 11683PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Pendergast, J., entered May 27, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action in tort, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent brought this action against the appellant to recover for an injury to his automobile, alleged to have been caused by the negligent act of a servant of the appellant. On a trial had before the court sitting without a jury, findings of fact were made in favor of the respondent, on which a judgment was entered for $400.

The principal errors assigned by the appellant question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment. The respondent, however, insists that these questions are not before-the court for want of sufficient ex*471ceptions to the. findings. The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. O. K. Transfer & Storage Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Kitsap County Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Peterson v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API