Gustamente v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
There are quite a number of bills of exception reserved setting out many reasons why the trial was illegal, and the judgment should be reversed. -The case, briefly stated, is: Appellant was charged with selling intoxicants to Felipe Benetez on the 20th day of October, 1916. The alleged purchaser testified that on that day he bought whisky from appellant, for which he paid him 75 cents. The State proved by the same witness and other…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cavaness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Stringer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Simms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Burton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.