Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Meade

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 29, 1977No. 48,264Published

1DissentFoth, J.

I cannot agree that this plaintiff should have a second chance to recover substantial damages simply because the jury failed to award her a little something for two bruises on her leg.

Plaintiff, a passenger, was the innocent victim of a rear end collision. Her evidence, taken at face value, disclosed two separate and distinct injuries. The first was a bruised leg, caused by being thrown against an air conditioner in the car. The second was a whiplash injury to the neck and spine. This latter injury was the claimed cause of low back and leg pain, headaches, dizziness and nausea, eventually…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Kitchen v. Lasley Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. King v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Nicolle v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Bryant v. ParrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API