Johnson v. Meade
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1DissentFoth, J.
I cannot agree that this plaintiff should have a second chance to recover substantial damages simply because the jury failed to award her a little something for two bruises on her leg.
Plaintiff, a passenger, was the innocent victim of a rear end collision. Her evidence, taken at face value, disclosed two separate and distinct injuries. The first was a bruised leg, caused by being thrown against an air conditioner in the car. The second was a whiplash injury to the neck and spine. This latter injury was the claimed cause of low back and leg pain, headaches, dizziness and nausea, eventually…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Kitchen v. Lasley Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- King v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Nicolle v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Bryant v. ParrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.