Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided July 22, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the verdict is excessive.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBARD, District Judge.1

The ground of the defendants’ liability is a narrow one. The plaintiff, who was employed as a laborer at their works, was engaged in the somewhat ordinary task of making whitewash from unslacked lime. He was using a sheet-iron can or drum, about the size of a barrel, and, after the lime had slacked a little, incautiously pouring in a second supply of water and stirring it around with a stick as he stood over it, the lime exploded in his face and burned out his eyes. The jury have found that, on account of the danger involved in the process, particularly where such a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morris v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. OttWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Foreman's Systems, Inc. v. Milk Dealers' Crate Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  4. The RuthDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1910
  5. Korzib v. Netherlands-American Steam Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API