Legal Opinion · Dissent

T.D.T. v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1999No. 1980562Published

1DissentJohnstone, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The learned trial judge erred to reversal in three of his rulings.

First, the trial judge did err in refusing to instruct the jury on assault in the third degree as a lesser offense included within the charged crime of child abuse. While the record contains plenty of evidence to convict the defendant of child abuse, as he was charged and convicted, nonetheless, the record contains countervailing evidence, as the opinion issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals acknowledges in these words:

“T.D.T. testified in his defense that he had never kicked his son or banged his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chavers v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Updyke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API