Geil v. State

The appellant appeals an order denying his motion seeking jail credit. Because the appellant’s motion was filed after July 1, 2013, it should be treated as though filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. The appellant’s motion is facially insufficient pursuant to that rule as he fails to allege any of the required information. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(c). Pursuant to the new rule the appellant is entitled to an opportunity to amend to *692state a facially sufficient claim. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(e) (incorporating Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(f)); Fla. R.Crim. P.…