Legal Opinion

Smock v. Hale

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 17, 1990No. 4-89-0673PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE KNECHT

delivered the opinion of the court:

In this malpractice action, the defendant succeeded in disqualifying the sole disclosed medical expert for the plaintiff in the pretrial setting. He then filed for summary judgment on the ground the plaintiff had failed to show any present ability to offer competent expert testimony on the applicable standard of medical care. The circuit court thereafter disposed of the action on a motion for summary judgment (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 2 — 1005(c)). We now reverse and remand.

In light of the issues raised on appeal, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Burtell v. First Charter Service Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Barliant v. Follett Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Moss v. GibbonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jackson v. GrahamAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Heller Financial, Inc. v. Johns-Byrne Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Steinberg v. DunsethAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Vallejo v. MercadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API