Legal Opinion
Voyeur Dorm, L.C. v. City of Tampa, FL
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 21, 2001No. 00-16346PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from Voyeur Dorm L.C.’s (“Voyeur Dorm”) alleged violation of Tampa’s City Code based on the district court’s characterization of Voyeur Dorm as an adult entertainment facility. Because we conclude the district court misapplied Tampa’s City Code when it erroneously found that Voyeur Dorm offered adult entertainment to the public at the residence in question, we reverse the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
As alleged in its complaint, Voyeur Dorm is a Florida limited liability company that maintains offices and conducts its business in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sammy's of Mobile, Ltd. v. City of MobileCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines, Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Flava Works, Inc. v. CITY OF MIAMI, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Flava Works, Inc. v. City of Miami, Fla.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Flava Works, Inc. v. City of Miami, Fla.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009