Rogers, Brown & Crocker Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1. Petitioner, organized in 1925 and doing a jobbing business in a large group of unrelated commodities, took inventories for 1927, 1928, and 1929 at cost. As to inventory practice in 1925 and 1926 the record is silent. The 1928 return stated that inventories were valued at the lower of cost or market, while the 1929 return stated that inventories were valued at cost.
Read the full summary
1. Petitioner, organized in 1925 and doing a jobbing business in a large group of unrelated commodities, took inventories for 1927, 1928, and 1929 at cost. As to inventory practice in 1925 and 1926 the record is silent. The 1928 return stated that inventories were valued at the lower of cost or market, while the 1929 return stated that inventories were valued at cost. Held, that the statement in the 1928 return, which is contrary to fact, was not the exercise of an election of basis for valuing inventories that is binding as to the taxable year 1929; and that petitioner, having consistently…
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, BROWN & CROCKER BROS., INC., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Rogers, Brown & Crocker Bros., Inc. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 67581.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
32 B.T.A. 307; 1935 BTA LEXIS 967;
March 29, 1935, Promulgated
1. Petitioner, organized in 1925 and doing a jobbing business in a large group of unrelated commodities, took inventories for 1927, 1928, and 1929 at cost. As to inventory practice in 1925 and 1926 the record is silent. The 1928 return stated that inventories were valued at the lower of cost or market, while the 1929 return stated that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rogers, Brown & Crocker Bros., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935