Legal Opinion

City of Manassas v. Rosson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 9, 1982No. Record 800642PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, C.J.

The zoning ordinance of the City of Manassas permits a limited home occupation in a residential district; however, § 1-34(a) of the ordinance restricts the right to “the immediate family residing in the dwelling.” The validity of § 1-34(a) was challenged by Doris B. Rosson who, on December 7, 1978, was summoned to appear in general district court to answer a charge that she operated a business in a residential district in violation of the Manassas ordinance. Upon her conviction in general district court, she appealed to circuit court.

While the appeal was pending, the zoning administrator of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Snell Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  4. Board of County Supervisors v. CarperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  5. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF JAMES CITY CTY. v. RoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. County Bd. of Arlington County v. BraticSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. Bell v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Hawthorne v. Village of Olympia FieldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Wheelabrator Clean Water System, Inc. v. King George CountyKing George County Circuit Court · 1997
  5. McGhee v. Zoning Appeals BoardVirginia Circuit Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API