Frank v. Frank
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Chief Justice:
Appeal from a divorce decree which allegedly was prejudicial as to alimony and property division. Affirmed with costs to respondent.
The respondent filed the divorce action but stood mute as to his alleged grounds therefor, and the divorce ultimately was granted to appellant, Mrs. Frank.
Respondent, married twice before, married appellant, about 10 years his junior. After two or three months the marriage was rocked by bickering and incompatibility, resulting in separation. Nonetheless, it fructified in the birth of a male child about a year later.
The litigants and their…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Aguire v. AguireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Bader v. BaderUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Broadbent v. BroadbentUtah Supreme Court · 1967