Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Estate of Niehenke

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 31, 1990No. 9504—5—III; 9767-6-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

58 Wn. App. 149 (1990)

791 P.2d 562

In the Matter of the Estate of RAYMOND J. NIEHENKE.

CATHERINE A. MIDTHUN, ET AL, Respondents,

v.

ELMER GUSKE, ET AL, Appellants.

Nos. 9504-5-III; 9767-6-III.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

May 31, 1990.

Kelly N. Brown and Irwin, Myklebust, Savage, Brown & Esser, P.S.; Wesley Nuxoll and Nuxoll, McBride & Libey, for appellants.

Martin G. Weber and Lukins & Annis, for respondents.

SHIELDS, J.

Elmer and Alvin Guske, as beneficiaries of the estate of their uncle, Raymond Niehenke, appeal a superior court order authorizing the children of Francis…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kiebler v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. In Re the Estate of BergauWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Burg v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary v. MoormanTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Stern v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API