Legal Opinion

Moen v. Peter Kiewit & Sons' Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1982No. Nos. 81-106, 82-29PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

These cases have been consolidated for consideration, as both cases involve claims for an employee’s death by heart attack. We affirm the lower courts in both cases.

In Case I, Supreme Court No. 82-29, claimant Moen appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Court, granting defendant’s motion to quash her petition for a hearing. Claimant Moen presents two issues to this Court:

*428(1) Whether defendant’s motion to quash was procedurally acceptable.(2) Whether newly discovered evidence supports Violette Moen’s request for a new hearing.

The defendant argues that this case is res judicata.

In…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Pickett v. KygerMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. Van DykenMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cooper v. RosstonMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wolfe v. WebbMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Citizens Awareness Network v. Montana Board of Environmental ReviewMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Lynch v. ReedMontana Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API