Legal Opinion

Hilbig v. Central Glass Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1991No. 90-296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

This is an appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Court’s order awarding attorney fees to the claimant based upon his recovery of benefits for domiciliary care. We affirm in part and remand to the Workers’ Compensation Court for further consideration.

The issues are:

1. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in awarding attorney fees to the claimant based upon his recovery of benefits for domiciliary care?

2. If the claimant was entitled to an award of attorney fees, what was the proper rate of payment?

The claimant was injured on November 17,1983, during the course of his employment with Central…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wight v. Hughes Livestock Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Zion's Properties, Inc. v. HoltUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Washington National Insurance Co. v. Sherwood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Fischer v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baeta v. Don Tripp TruckingMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Madill v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Madill v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Madill v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API